Toyota Camry (1984–1989)
Compact carsdieselgas17.8 cu ft max
Trunk
60
VE SCORE
Good Volumetric Efficiency for a compact cars — cargo volume × EPA MPGe, ranked against class peers.
Storage spaces
Sedan (2nd generation)
secondary sourceSource: www.ultimatespecs.com — secondary source · community verification wanted
Spot an error? Suggest a correction (citation required) · Edit history
Cargo dimensions
| Measurement | Sedan (2nd generation) |
|---|---|
| Cargo volume | 505 L / 17.8 cu ft[1] |
| Confidence | Secondary source |
- www.ultimatespecs.com · Secondary source
Last verified Oct 20, 2026. Volumes are as the source states them (US figures are usually SAE J1100); lengths are usable interior measurements. How we measure.
Fit reports from owners
No fit reports yet. Hauled something in a Toyota Camry? Tell everyone how it went.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
Fuel economy (EPA)
| Trim | Years | Fuel | Best combined MPGe | City | Highway |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual 5-spd | 1984 | Diesel | 32 | 29 | 37 |
| FrontWD · Automatic 4-spd | 1985–1989 | Diesel | 29 | 26 | 33 |
| FrontWD · Manual 5-spd | 1985–1989 | Regular Gasoline | 27 | 25 | 31 |
| Automatic 4-spd | 1984 | Regular Gasoline | 26 | 23 | 29 |
| 4-Wheel or AWD · Manual 5-spd | 1988–1989 | Regular Gasoline | 21 | 19 | 24 |
| 4-Wheel or AWD · Automatic 4-spd | 1989 | Regular Gasoline | 21 | 19 | 23 |
Related
Other generations
Compact cars with similar VE
Honda Accord (1994–1997)25.7 cu ft maxVE 61Audi A4 (1996–2001)25.4 cu ft maxVE 61Volkswagen Jetta (1993–1998)15.0 cu ft maxVE 60
Compare with
Toyota Camry (1984–1989) vs Honda Civic (2001–2005): cargo volume, floor, opening and lift-over side by side.