Mitsubishi Mirage (1985–1989)
Subcompact carsgas12.0 cu ft max
Hatch
64
VE SCORE
Good Volumetric Efficiency for a subcompact cars — cargo volume × EPA MPGe, ranked against class peers.
Storage spaces
Hatchback, seats-up
secondary sourceSource: fueleconomy.gov — secondary source · community verification wanted
Spot an error? Suggest a correction (citation required) · Edit history
Cargo dimensions
hatchback
| Measurement | Hatchback, seats-up |
|---|---|
| Cargo volume | 339 L / 12.0 cu ft[1] |
| Confidence | Secondary source |
- fueleconomy.gov · Secondary source
sedan
| Measurement | Sedan, seats-up |
|---|---|
| Cargo volume | 283 L / 10.0 cu ft[1] |
| Confidence | Secondary source |
- fueleconomy.gov · Secondary source
Last verified Oct 20, 2026. Volumes are as the source states them (US figures are usually SAE J1100); lengths are usable interior measurements. How we measure.
Fit reports from owners
No fit reports yet. Hauled something in a Mitsubishi Mirage? Tell everyone how it went.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
Fuel economy (EPA)
| Trim | Years | Fuel | Best combined MPGe | City | Highway |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FrontWD · Manual 4-spd | 1985–1989 | Regular Gasoline | 33 | 31 | 36 |
| FrontWD · Manual 5-spd | 1985–1989 | Regular Gasoline | 31 | 28 | 35 |
| FrontWD · Automatic 3-spd | 1985–1989 | Regular Gasoline | 27 | 25 | 29 |
Related
Other generations
All Mitsubishi Mirage generations
Subcompact cars with similar VE
BMW 2 Series Coupe (2022–present)13.8 cu ft maxVE 66Chevrolet Sprint (1992–1994)10.0 cu ft maxVE 65Mitsubishi Eclipse (2000–2005)16.9 cu ft maxVE 63
Compare with
Mitsubishi Mirage (1985–1989) vs Acura Integra (1986–1989): cargo volume, floor, opening and lift-over side by side.